🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's lawmakers have decided to withdraw from an international accord designed to safeguard females from abuse, including domestic abuse, following extensive and intense debates in the parliament.

Thousands of protesters assembled in the capital this week to voice disagreement with the decision. The ultimate decision now rests with Head of State the nation's president, who must determine whether to endorse or reject the legislation.

Referred to as the European treaty, the international accord only became active in Latvia last twelve months ago, requiring governments to establish laws and assistance programs to end all types of abuse.

Latvia has become the first EU country to begin the procedure of withdrawing from the convention. Turkey pulled out in 2021, a move that human rights organizations characterized as a significant regression for women's rights.

Ideological Controversy and Resistance

The treaty was approved by the European Union in 2023, yet traditionalist factions have argued that its emphasis on gender equality undermines family values and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy debate in the Saeima, lawmakers voted 56 to 32 to exit from the treaty, a action proposed by political opponents but backed by politicians from one of the three coalition parties.

The result represents a setback for moderate conservative Prime Minister the nation's PM, who stood with demonstrators outside parliament earlier this week. "We refuse to give up, we will continue fighting so that abuse will not prevail," she declared to the crowd.

Political Divisions and Responses

One of the main parties supporting the withdrawal is Latvia First, whose leader has called on citizens to choose between what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "gender ideology with multiple sexes".

The nation's ombudswoman the rights official urged the treaty not to be made political, while the group Equality Now stated it was "not a threat to national principles, it was an instrument to achieve them".

The Thursday's decision has sparked broad outcry both within Latvia and abroad.

Twenty-two thousand people have endorsed a national petition calling for the convention to be preserved. The gender equality group Centrs Marta has called a protest for next Thursday, charging MPs of disregarding the will of the nation's citizens.

International Concerns and Possible Next Steps

The leader of the Council of Europe's parliamentary assembly commented that Latvia had made a rash decision fueled by misinformation. He characterized it as an "unprecedented and extremely worrying regression for female equality and human rights in Europe".

He noted that since Turkey abandoned the convention in 2021, cases of gender-based killings and violence against women had increased significantly.

Because the vote did not secure a supermajority majority, the head of state could possibly return the legislation for additional review if he has objections.

Head of State the national leader stated on digital platforms that he would assess the vote according to constitutional requirements, "taking into account governmental and judicial considerations, rather than belief-based viewpoints".

Last week, another component of the ruling coalition, the Progressives, indicated it would not rule out petitioning to the supreme judicial body.

"This decision represents a worrisome development for women's rights not only in Latvia but across the continent," stated a human rights activist.

• Domestic abuse rates have been rising in several EU nations
• The European treaty mandates specific safeguards for survivors of gender-based violence
• Latvia's decision could affect comparable discussions in additional member states