Relatives' Distress Regarding Shoreline Erosion Endangering Coastal Norfolk Graves
Loved ones of people buried in graves at risk from shoreline retreat say that indecision over how to tackle the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.
A Looming Threat to Ancient Graveyards
The council have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.
A recent report on the issue details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to move forward.
“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”
Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.
Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles
A local business owner recalled a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.
“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves looking for valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”
“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”
A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy
Along the shoreline is situated the grave of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.
“It does disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”
She believes, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”
Seeking Solutions and Clarity
The lack of agreement over when and how to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.
Some are calling for additional coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to continue for now. Different voices contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.
“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”
A local official said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with communities.”
He added there was time to weigh all the options. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”
“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the right solutions for each village.”
The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in life after death, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.